高级检索
赵雯雯,龚家俊,黄志甲,等. 基于模糊综合评价的户式空调系统优选方案评估方法[J]. 安徽工业大学学报(自然科学版),xxxx,x(x):x-xx. DOI: 10.12415/j.issn.1671-7872.23175
引用本文: 赵雯雯,龚家俊,黄志甲,等. 基于模糊综合评价的户式空调系统优选方案评估方法[J]. 安徽工业大学学报(自然科学版),xxxx,x(x):x-xx. DOI: 10.12415/j.issn.1671-7872.23175
ZHAO Wenwen, GONG Jiajun, HUANG Zhijia, JIANG Zhuxuan. Optimal Selection of Evaluation Methods of Residential Air Conditioning System Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Technology(Natural Science). DOI: 10.12415/j.issn.1671-7872.23175
Citation: ZHAO Wenwen, GONG Jiajun, HUANG Zhijia, JIANG Zhuxuan. Optimal Selection of Evaluation Methods of Residential Air Conditioning System Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Technology(Natural Science). DOI: 10.12415/j.issn.1671-7872.23175

基于模糊综合评价的户式空调系统优选方案评估方法

Optimal Selection of Evaluation Methods of Residential Air Conditioning System Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation

  • 摘要: 针对户式空调系统性能评价常用方法存在评价指标不全面、评价过程复杂、评价结果主观性强等不足,提出1种户式空调系统性能模糊综合评价方法。考虑空调行业绿色低碳的发展要求,在原有评价指标的基础上增加室外环境及技术特性相关指标,采用层次分析法建立户式空调系统性能评价指标体系,采用专家调查法和信息熵法分别对指标权重进行赋值和修正,采用分布函数法和等级比重法分别对定量和定性指标进行隶属度计算,最后进行模糊综合评价。以多联机和热湿分控2种典型户式空调系统方案为例,分别采用层次分析法和本文方法进行评价,验证本文方法的科学合理性。结果表明:2种评价方法对多联机和热湿分控方案的综合评定等级均为Ⅱ级,对于层次分析法,综合评价值分别为53.72,53.43,2种方案的评价结果几乎一致,2种方案没有明显优劣,难以为空调选型提供参考;对于本文方法,2种方案的评价结果差值明显,可为空调选型提供参考。这是因为本文方法的评价指标更全面,且在模糊评价法和信息熵法的作用下完成复杂问题的量化,可弥补评价过程复杂和评价结果主观性强的不足。

     

    Abstract: In view of the shortcomings of common evaluation methods of residential air conditioning system performance evaluation, such as incomplete evaluation index, complex evaluation process and subjective evaluation results, a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method of residential air conditioning system performance was proposed. Considering the green and low-carbon development requirements of air conditioning industry, the outdoor environment and technical characteristics related indicators were added on the basis of the original evaluation indicators, the analytic hierarchy process was used to establish the performance evaluation index system of residential air conditioning system, the expert survey method and information entropy method were used to assign and revise the proportions of the indicators respectively, and the distribution function method and grade proportion method were used to calculate the membership degree of quantitative and qualitative indicators. Finally, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation was carried out. Two typical residential air conditioning system schemes, variable refrigerant volume system and temperature and humidity independent control system, were evaluated by AHP and this method respectively to verify the scientific rationality of this method. The results show that the comprehensive evaluation grade of the two evaluation methods for variable refrigerant volume system and temperature and humidity independent control system are both grade Ⅱ, and the comprehensive evaluation value of the analytic hierarchy process is 53.72 and 53.43, respectively. The evaluation results of the two schemes are almost the same, and the two schemes have no obvious advantages and disadvantages, which is difficult to provide reference for the selection of air conditioners. As for the method in this paper, the difference between the evaluation results of the two schemes is obvious, which can provide a reference for the selection of air conditioners. This is because the evaluation index of this method is more comprehensive, and the quantification of complex problems is completed under the function of fuzzy evaluation method and information entropy method, which can make up for the shortcomings of complex evaluation process and strong subjectivity of evaluation results.

     

/

返回文章
返回