高级检索
吴明洁,方大春. 我国省域“四链”耦合的空间网络结构及影响因素[J]. 安徽工业大学学报(自然科学版),xxxx,x(x):x-xx. DOI: 10.12415/j.issn.1671-7872.24057
引用本文: 吴明洁,方大春. 我国省域“四链”耦合的空间网络结构及影响因素[J]. 安徽工业大学学报(自然科学版),xxxx,x(x):x-xx. DOI: 10.12415/j.issn.1671-7872.24057
WU Mingjie, FANG Dachun. Spatial Network Structure and Influencing Factors of the “Four-Chain” Coupling in China’s Province[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Technology(Natural Science). DOI: 10.12415/j.issn.1671-7872.24057
Citation: WU Mingjie, FANG Dachun. Spatial Network Structure and Influencing Factors of the “Four-Chain” Coupling in China’s Province[J]. Journal of Anhui University of Technology(Natural Science). DOI: 10.12415/j.issn.1671-7872.24057

我国省域“四链”耦合的空间网络结构及影响因素

Spatial Network Structure and Influencing Factors of the “Four-Chain” Coupling in China’s Province

  • 摘要: 区域经济一体化深入推进,要素流动突破地理“邻近”限制,要素耦合提升不仅取决于自身属性,亦取决于空间关联效应。采用耦合协调度模型,测度我国省域创新链产业链资金链人才链(简称“四链”)耦合协调度水平;基于测度结果运用社会网络分析(SNA)方法,考察省域“四链”耦合空间关联网络结构特征;运用二次指派程序(QAP)探究省域“四链”耦合的影响因素。结果表明:2016—2021年我国省域“四链”耦合协调度呈稳步提升态势,但总体仍处于较低水平,呈“东高西低”非均衡分布特征。整体网络特征方面,“四链”耦合协调空间网络紧密度呈波动上升,总体仍有较大提升空间;上海、江苏、北京等地区处于核心位置,而海南、宁夏、新疆等地区处于边缘位置,“核心—边缘”结构特征明显。科技创新投入强度、经济水平和教育投入强度对省域“四链”耦合空间关联有显著影响。应树立联动意识,弱化距离等因素制约,促进区域间资源要素流动;制定差别化的区域发展政策,优化空间网络结构,缩小区域间差距,进一步推进“四链”深度耦合协调发展。

     

    Abstract: Regional economic integration has been further promoted, and the flow of factors has broken through the geographical “neighbourly” restrictions. The enhancement of factor coupling depends not only on its own attributes, but also on the spatial association effect. A coupling coordination model was adopted to measure the coupling coordination level of China’s provincial innovation chain industrial chain capital chain talent chain (referred to as “four chains”). Based on the measurement results, the social network analysis (SNA) method was used to investigate the characteristics of the provincial “four chains” coupling spatial association network structure. The quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) was used to explore the influencing factors of the “four-chain” coupling in the province. The results show that in 2016—2021, the “four-chain” coupling coordination in China’s provinces has steadily improved, but the overall level is still at a low level, showing the non-equilibrium distribution of “high east and low west”. In terms of overall network characteristics, the tightness of the “four-chain” coupling and coordination space network fluctuates, and there is still a lot of room for improvement in the whole; Shanghai, Jiangsu, Beijing and other regions are in the core position, while Hainan, Ningxia, Xinjiang and other regions are in the marginal position, and the “core—edge” structure characteristics are obvious. The intensity of scientific and technological innovation investment, economic level and education investment intensity have a significant impact on the “four-chain” coupling spatial correlation in the province. We should establish linkage awareness, weaken distance and other constraints, and promote the flow of resource elements between regions; formulate differentiated regional development policies, optimise the spatial network structure, narrow the interregional gap, and further promote the deep coupling and coordinated development of the “four chains”.

     

/

返回文章
返回