高级检索

融入底线思维的重大疫情防控策略三参照点决策方法

A Tri-reference-point Decision-making Method for Major Epidemic Prevention and Control Strategies Based on Bottom-line Thinking

  • 摘要: 重大疫情防控策略决策事关人民生命安全与社会稳定,属于典型的高风险决策问题。底线思维作为防范化解重大风险的根本遵循,对疫情防控的科学决策具有重要的理论价值与实践指导意义。为此,本文以底线思维为指导,构建一种基于三参照点的重大疫情防控策略模型。该方法突破传统前景理论仅以“现状”为单一参照点的局限,引入“底线”与“目标”2个关键参照点,与“现状”共同构成决策框架,从而更精准地刻画决策者在面对极端损失(突破底线)和理想收益(达成目标)时的风险心理与行为特征。为真实反映底线思维下决策者对极端风险的高度敏感,将概率权重函数从单一参照点拓展至三参照点框架,显著提升了对决策者主观概率感知差异的刻画能力。实例分析验证了该方法的有效性与可行性。参数敏感性分析进一步表明,“底线”的设定会显著增强决策者对损失的规避程度,而“目标”的设定则直接影响其对收益的期望值,从而凸显了底线思维在模型中的核心作用。本研究为底线思维在重大疫情防控等高风险决策中的量化应用提供了理论支持与方法支撑。

     

    Abstract: Decision-making regarding prevention and control strategies for major pandemics concerns people’s safety and social stability, and it represents a typical high-risk decision-making problem. As a fundamental guideline for preventing and resolving major risks, bottom-line thinking holds significant theoretical value and practical guiding significance for scientific decision-making in pandemic response. To this end, guided by the bottom-line thinking, a fundamental principle for preventing and mitigating major risks, a three-reference-point decision-making model for major epidemic prevention and control strategies was constructed. This method overcomes the limitation of traditional prospect theory, which relies solely on the “status quo” as a single reference point, by introducing two key reference points—“bottom line” and “target”—to form a decision-making framework together with the “status quo”. This framework more accurately characterizes the risk psychology and behavioral traits of decision-makers when confronting extreme losses (breaching the bottom line) and ideal gains (achieving the target). To more realistically reflect the heightened sensitivity of decision-makers to extreme risks under bottom-line thinking, the probability weighting function was extended from a single-reference-point to a three-reference-point framework, significantly enhancing the ability to depict differences in decision-makers’ subjective probability perceptions. A case analysis was conducted to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method. Parameter sensitivity analysis further demonstrates that the setting of the “bottom line” significantly increases decision-makers’ loss aversion, while the setting of the “target” directly influences their expected value of gains, thereby highlighting the central role of bottom-line thinking in the model. This research provides theoretical and methodological support for the quantitative application of bottom-line thinking in high-risk decision-making contexts such as major epidemic prevention and control.

     

/

返回文章
返回