高级检索

中国房地产市场泡沫检验与传染路径研究

Bubble Detection and Contagion Path in China’s Real Estate Market

  • 摘要: 选取2012—2023年中国35个大中城市的面板数据,构建房价租金比序列,运用广义上确界ADF检验(GSADF)方法,识别房地产市场的泡沫存在性及其起止时点;并进一步选取4个典型城市群和3个特定时间点,采用时变参数向量自回归(TVP-VAR)模型,考察核心城市房价泡沫对其他城市的动态传染效应及其特征。GSADF检验结果表明:35个大中城市普遍存在房价泡沫,但泡沫个数、发生时期及持续时间呈现显著区域差异;截至研究期末,部分城市仍处于泡沫持续期,另一些城市在宽松宏观调控政策刺激下可能进入新一轮泡沫积累阶段。TVP-VAR模型结果显示:房价泡沫传染呈现以深圳为核心的、由一线城市向新一线及二线城市逐级扩散的结构特征,空间上呈自东部向中部、西部逐级递减的阶梯式分布格局。传染动因方面,地理邻近性是短期内泡沫连锁反应的主因,经济关联效应则是长期深度传染的核心驱动力。基于上述结论,本文从加强核心城市调控、完善调控政策评估机制、提升政策时效性三个维度提出建议,为评估调控政策效果、实施差异化宏观调控及防范系统性金融风险提供了理论支撑与实证依据。

     

    Abstract: To investigate the existence of a property market bubble in China and its contagion characteristics, panel data from 35 large and medium-sized Chinese cities over the period 2012—2023 were utilized. A house price-to-rent ratio sequence was constructed, and the generalized sup augmented Dickey-Fuller (GSADF) test was applied to identify the presence of housing bubbles and their start and end points. Four typical urban agglomerations and three specific time points were further selected, and a time-varying parameter vector autoregressive (TVP-VAR) model was employed to examine the dynamic contagion effects of house price bubbles in core cities on other cities. The GSADF test results indicate that housing price bubbles are prevalent across the 35 large and medium-sized cities, although there are regional variations in the number of bubbles, the periods in which they occur, and their duration. Some cities remain in the bubble continuation phase, whilst others may re-enter a new phase of bubble accumulation under the stimulus of accommodative macro-control policies. The TVP-VAR model results show that the contagion of housing price bubbles exhibits a hierarchical diffusion pattern centered on Shenzhen, spreading sequentially from first-tier to new first-tier to second-tier cities, with a spatial stepwise attenuation pattern declining from the eastern to the central and western regions. Regarding the drivers of contagion, geographical proximity emerges as the primary cause of short-term bubble chain reactions, whilst economic interdependence serves as the core driver of long-term deep contagion. Based on these findings, policy recommendations are proposed from three dimensions: strengthening regulatory measures in core cities, optimizing the evaluation mechanism for regulatory policies, and enhancing policy timeliness. Theoretical support and empirical evidence are provided for assessing the effectiveness of regulatory policies, implementing differentiated macroeconomic controls, and preventing systemic financial risks.

     

/

返回文章
返回